Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The Defendant and the victim B related to neighboring residents, and the Defendant’s wife, who settled cable broadcasting charges against multi-family housing, filed a claim for the settlement of cable broadcasting charges with the victim from July 2013. However, the victim raised an objection to future creative science department and C Cable Broadcasting on the ground that the victim’s self-payment of charges was unfair. Around 19:00 on May 29, 2017, the Defendant talked with the issue of raising cable broadcasting objection before Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, 103 on May 29, 2017, and 3 and 4 victims, including those related to cable broadcast C, among the victims, “Ise Ma, a national organization, and a cable broadcast organization,” and whether I raised an objection to such broadcast.

In this regard, the victim publicly insultingd the victim by the phrase “the self-refluence of fule”.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. E statements;

1. Investigation reports (referring to oral statements made by persons related to C Wire broadcasting), and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (referring to investigations by police officers dispatched to the scene);

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;