The reinforcement evidence of a confession does not require that the defendant's voluntary confession is not processed, but is sufficient to prove the truth, and it does not necessarily require that the evidence alone constitutes an objective element. Thus, if the defendant proves that he/she has exercised his/her identification card of this case up to the time of the original adjudication, such as the time of the original adjudication, and if there is an identification card that has been presented, the above identification card is an indirect evidence to prove the authenticity of the confession unless the confession is not voluntary, the above confession cannot be considered as an indirect evidence to prove the existence of the above confession, although the court below's failure to consider the above confession alone as an evidence cannot be considered as a misunderstanding of the legal principles of the ordinary evidence, it is reasonable to discuss the above facts.

Therefore, it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench to reverse and remand the acquittal portion of the judgment below.

Justices Kang Jong-young (Presiding Justice)