beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.13 2015가단5128106

건물명도

Text

1. The defendant is against the plaintiffs:

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. From October 11, 2014, the above-mentioned A

(b).

Reasons

Attached Form

Each fact in the cause of the claim shall be acknowledged by adding up the whole purpose of the pleadings to the statements in Gap 1 through 4.

Therefore, the lease contract concluded between the plaintiffs and the defendant regarding the real estate stated in the separate sheet is deemed to have been lawfully terminated upon arrival of the defendant by the content-certified mail on March 16, 2015, which contains the defendant's expression of termination of the contract on the ground of the rent delay. Thus, the defendant is obligated to deliver the real estate stated in the separate sheet to the plaintiffs and return the amount of unjust enrichment equivalent to KRW 1,650,000, which was the agreed rent from October 11, 2014 to the completion date of delivery of the real estate stated in the separate sheet.

Therefore, the plaintiffs' claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.