When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2014. 12. 30. 01:45경 안산시 단원구 C에 있는 ‘D’ 앞 노상에서 그곳 파라솔 의자에 앉아 서로 이야기를 나누고 있는 피해자 E과 피해자 F를 보고 다가가 “어이 예쁜 언니들, 안 들어가고 뭐해 나랑 한번 놀아볼래.”라고 말하였으나 피해자 E이 “할아버지 술 드셨으면 그냥 가세요.”라고 말하였음에도 이를 무시한 채 손으로 피해자 E의 머리와 어깨를 수회 쓰다듬다가 갑자기 “보지가 그리웠다. 내가 너희들 보지 빤다.”라고 말하면서 피해자 E의 왼쪽 가슴을 손등으로 1회 치고, 이를 제지하는 피해자 F의 왼쪽 가슴을 손등으로 1회 치는 등 피해자들을 강제로 각각 추행하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant's statement in the court (the defendant and his defense counsel alleged to the effect that the defendant was not in a state of mental and physical disability of the victim E and F, and that he was in a state of mental and physical disability of the victim E and F, but in light of the consistent and specific statements from each investigation agency of the victim E and F to this court, etc., the facts of indecent act by compulsion of the victims can be sufficiently acknowledged as stated in the defendant's crime. Furthermore, according to the records, although the fact of drinking is recognized at the time of the above crime, it is difficult to view that the defendant was in a state of lacking ability to discern things or make decisions, the defendant's argument with the defense

1. Each legal statement of E and F;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of E and F;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 298 of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine (in spite of the failure to recover damage to victims until the job, the defendant's reflects, the extent of indecent act is relatively minor, and the defendant's initial criminal).

1. The former part of Article 37 and Article 38 of the Criminal Code to increase concurrent crimes.