성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)[예비적죄명:성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)미수]
2016Do19187 Violation of the Special Act on the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Use of Cameras, etc.)
(Recording)
[Preliminary Crime Name: Special Act on the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes
Attempted Violation (Attempted Use and Screening of Cameras, etc.)
A
Prosecutor
Law Firm (LLC) AE
Attorney AF, AG, AI, AJ
Suwon District Court Decision 2015No7723 Decided November 3, 2016
February 15, 2017
The appeal is dismissed.
The grounds of appeal are examined.
For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court acquitted the Defendant on the ground that there was no proof of the crime in all of the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, which is the primary charge of the instant case, and the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, which is the ancillary charge added at the lower court.
Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the record, the lower court’s aforementioned determination is justifiable, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.
Justices Park Jae-young
Justices Park Young-young
Chief Justice Kim Jong-il
Justices Kim Jae-in