However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is working as the president of the Korea D (hereinafter referred to as “D”) G, and was in general in charge of D’s property management.

On 76-lane 10, as Seoul Metropolitan Government National Assembly, the Korea D D D D's establishment of a general meeting of the Korea D's D's establishment of the E's establishment of the E's establishment of the E's establishment of the E's establishment of the E's establishment of the E's establishment of the establishment of the E's establishment of the establishment of the E's establishment of the establishment of the E's establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the E's establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the E's establishment of the establishment of the E's establishment of the establishment of the E's establishment of the establishment of the E's establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the E's establishment

Since then, as the church Promotion Institute and the Korean War Veterans Association failed to pay the remainder of the construction design cost at E offices, the Korean War Veterans Association requested the US Southern to transfer the construction design cost to the South Korean War Veterans Association. Accordingly, the South Korean War Veterans Association of the US to accept the above request and transferred the construction design cost to E offices without deducting the amount of KRW 67 million already paid by D.

Accordingly, the E office will return the construction design cost of KRW 67 million already paid by D.

On October 23, 2008, the defendant requested F to transfer the construction design cost of KRW 67 million to the representative director of E office, and embezzled using the construction design cost of KRW 67 million to the new bank account (Account Number: G) in the name of the defendant on October 23, 2008 by receiving return of KRW 67 million in the construction design cost from the defendant's new bank account (Account Number) and used it as the defendant's living cost, credit card payment, loan repayment, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Part concerning the statement of H in the second prosecutor's examination protocol against the defendant

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to H;

1. An investigation report (to attach details of transactions with a new bank account in the name of a suspect who has received remittance of 67 million won in the construction design cost of a building at a general meeting held by the Korean National Assembly in the Korean War);

1. The details of each account transaction (defendant.