However, it is against the Defendants for two years from the date the judgment became final and conclusive.

피고인들은 2018. 3. 17. 23:45 경 서울 구로구 E 앞 도로에서, 그 곳을 지나가던 피해자 F(48 세), 피해자 G(49 세) 이 자신들에게 시비를 거는 것으로 오해하여 피고인 A는 주먹으로 피해자 F의 얼굴과 몸 부위를 수회 때리고 옆에 있던 피해자 G이 자신을 말리자 발로 피해자 G의 몸 부위를 걷어차고 주먹으로 피해자 G의 얼굴 부위를 수회 때렸고, 피고인 B은 그곳에 있던 위험한 물건인 나무 의자를 들어 바닥에 넘어진 피해자 F의 얼굴 부위를 내리친 다음 주먹으로 피해자 F의 몸 부위를 수회 때리고 발로 피해자 F을 수회 걷어차고 주먹으로 피해자 G의 얼굴 부위를 수회 때렸고, 계속하여 피고인 A는 발로 바닥에 넘어진 피해자 F을 걷어찼다.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with the victim F while carrying dangerous objects, and inflicted injury on the victim F, such as inside and salkes, in need of treatment for about 8 weeks, and injury on the victim G, such as brain salins, which require treatment for about 2 weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. Other closure photographs of each CCTV image;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes in Part II of the death diagnosis report;

1. The Defendants of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 258-2(1), 257(1), and 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants who are subject to aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants in suspended execution: The degree of injury inflicted upon the victim F for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is more severe; the Defendants’ rejection of the initial crime was unfavorable; however, the Defendants’ rejection of the commission of the crime was at the latest, and the victims did not want the Defendants’ punishment upon agreement with the victims; the Defendants did not have any criminal history exceeding the domestic fine; and the records and records of this case, including the Defendants’ age, family relationship, and environment.