1. Defendant A and Defendant B maintained the judgment of the first instance court that convicted the Defendants of the facts charged.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on “criminal proceeds,” “facing,” “facing,” and “cacing,” in the crime of gambling and the crime of

2. According to Article 383 subparag. 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, Defendant C may file an appeal on the ground of unfair sentencing only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years has

Therefore, in this case where the defendant was sentenced to a more minor sentence, the argument that the punishment is too unreasonable is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

3. The Defendants’ final appeal is dismissed in entirety as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.