However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant, at a work-based corporation B, demanded the submission of a certificate of college graduation to register with the Research and Development Service Association, and the defendant had a mind to forge the certificate of college graduation that he left the military.

On December 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) contacted B office located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C, with the phone number posted on the Internet site operated by his/her name in order to forge the “Sanam University graduate certificate; (b) around that time, the name influor requested the forgery of the “A”; (c) “A” in the “A” in the “A”; (d) date of birth in the “B” column; (d) date of birth in the “D”; (c) March 3, 1997; (d) date of entrance; (d) February 14, 2003; (e) date of graduation; and (e) date of graduation; and (e) date of graduation; and (e) date of graduation; and (e) date of entry, the Defendant entered the name and seal affixed thereto; and (e) sent the file to the Defendant’s employee’s e-mail and sent the file to the Defendant’s employee’s e-mail to the H around December 23, 2016.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with a name-free person, forged a certificate of graduation from the Honam University, which is a private document to prove facts for the purpose of exercising the right.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on internal investigation (related to attachment, such as a copy of forged document);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (related to attachment of materials, such as whether to graduate);

1. Articles 231, 30 (the occupation of Article 23 of the Criminal Act on the crime), 234, and 231 of the Criminal Act on the crime (the occupation of exercising the aforementioned investigation document);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the community service order is that the defendant was only punished by a fine, and that the defendant was only punished by a fine.