A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant’s relationship 1) were written to the effect that both the Plaintiff and the Defendant were working together in a law office located in Korea as U.S. attorneys-at-law in Korea, and from July 2013, the Plaintiff developed into a relationship with the Defendant from July 2014. (2) The Plaintiff became aware of the Defendant, other than the Plaintiff, at the same time, that there was more women, such as C and D, who were in a relationship with the Defendant, and around that time, C and C, who returned to the Defendant for 11 year, were to enter into a marriage with the Defendant at the same time by going through the marriage of 6-7 women, including female employees in the law office located in the law office, through social network services, became known even in the law office where the Defendant had been working, and thus the Defendant went through conflict with the Plaintiff.

B. The defendant's criminal act found guilty

1. On April 2014, the Defendant (the Defendant; hereinafter the same shall apply) in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant”) took pictures of videos containing a head of the body where the victim of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E-building (the Plaintiff; hereinafter the same shall apply) was in a sexual intercourse with the victim and was in a sexual intercourse with the victim, thereby manipulating the Defendant’s mobile phone camera function in the victim’s mobile phone camera function, and the victim was deprived of the victim, and the Defendant was a head of the body where the victim was in a sexual intercourse with the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant taken the body of the victim who could cause a sense of sexual shame by using the camera function against the victim's will.

2. Intimidation;

A. On May 19, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 00:00 on May 19, 2014, on the ground that, within the Defendant’s car parked in front of the “E building,” the Defendant’s phone call from another female-friendly job offering F before locking, the Defendant did not receive it, but did not receive it; (b) while showing the Defendant’s sexual relation and the victim’s photograph stored in the Defendant’s mobile phone, the victim’s speech.