2. The judgment is based on the following facts: (a) the defendant led to the confession and reflect of the crime of this case; (b) the defendant additionally repaid KRW 1.1 million to the victim D; and (c) the defendant was only subject to a single-time fine. However, the defendant's argument is not accepted since the amount acquired by the defendant through the crime of this case reaches KRW 5.16 billion and the unpaid damage amount remains more than KRW 15.5 million, and even if the defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim up to the trial; and (c) comprehensively examines various circumstances, including the fact that the defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim; and (d) the defendant did not reach an age-oriented environment of the defendant; and thus, (e) the defendant's argument is not acceptable.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.