beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.06.11 2013고단3327

사기

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On March 21, 2008, the Defendant, along with C, produced and sold the diesel game machine (hereinafter “instant game machine”) to the complainant F at the office of the E office located on the 2nd floor of the building in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangdong-gu (hereinafter “instant office”). The game machine is an innovative game machine that can concurrently serve as entertainment and PC. This game machine is an innovative game machine that does not contain any legal problems, not an illegal act such as the sea open, but there is no legal problem. Merely, even if any problem arises, the Defendant would compensate for all.”

However, the instant game was an illegal game that did not obtain deliberation and approval from the Korea Media Rating Board.

In collusion with C, the Defendant received KRW 15 million from tin to the NA bank account under the name of the Defendant for sales proceeds of the instant game machine. The Defendant received KRW 24 million from around March 26, 2008 from the victim to the new bank account in the name of C. < Amended by Act No. 8857, Mar. 26, 2008>

2. Of the facts charged in the instant case, even though the instant game machine was an illegal game that did not obtain deliberation and approval from the Korea Media Rating Board, the Defendant and C were false as a game machine with no legal problem.

On the other hand, the defendant asserts that the defendant had consistently expressed that the game machine of this case was not deliberated by the investigative agency from the investigative agency to this court, and that the defendant did not say that it was a game machine with no legal problem.

From 197, G had conducted business with the complainant, and the defendant and the complainant continued to accompany the complainant in the process of purchasing the game of this case from the defendant and C as a socially-friendly organization. The complainant is consistent from the investigative agency to this court, and the complainant was first sphone.