However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 20:25 on September 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) was a person engaged in driving a B-si; (b) was a victim C (the age of 42) who crosses the road to the right side from the left side of the progress direction of the Defendant due to occupational negligence, who neglected the Defendant’s duty of e-mailing, while driving a B-si and driving a B-si, and driving a sample in front of the B-si, I-si, N-si, N-si, N-si, and driving a e-si, K-si, N-si, E-si, E-si, E-si, E-si, E-si, E-si, E-si, E-si, E-si, E-si, E-si, E-si, E-si, and caused the death of the e-car shock.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Traffic accident report (1), application of photographs, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents by the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act (the occupation of death by occupational negligence, occupation of

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., that the defendant has been divided in depth, that the bereaved family members of the victim has been paid KRW 18 million to fully agree, that there is no record of criminal punishment for the defendant, and that the victim has partially caused the occurrence of an accident on the part of the victim and the expansion of damage due to the crossing without permission);