1. Around April 6, 2017, the Defendant’s insultd the victim F, a police officer of the Yongsan Police Station E District, dispatched to the site after receiving a report of the same kind of fighting in the above restaurant because he/she had been in the same way as the Defendant’s operation D'D in the operation of the Defendant located in the Dong-gu Busan Metropolitan City, Busan Metropolitan City. On April 6, 2017, the Defendant disputed the Defendant.

B. In order to hear the statements from G, there are several persons in the name of H, I, J, and the above restaurant, a police officer of the B and the victim, who is a police officer of the B and the victim, who is the victim of the G, the victim “I am this son, I ambling. N. D. I ambling in the body of the victim.

“The expression was expressed in a large sound.”

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the date and place specified in paragraph (1), and at the place, H, a police officer belonging to the Jungsan Police Station E District, disputed with the Defendant.

G is a defect that is about to go out of the above restaurant, and “Cp. D. D. D. will go off and go off in order to go off.”

Definites shall be discarded.

The term “W” refers to a large sound, booms H’s breath, and h’s chest part by hand was 2 to 3 smuggling.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of order and investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and H;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes is not only a number of violent crimes and criminal records of the same kind, but also a number of criminal records and criminal records of the same offense. In addition, the police officers dispatched to the site upon receipt of a report during the suspension period of the execution of the same criminal records, who did not know of the fact that they committed a crime interfering with the performance of official duties by means of a method similar to the previous offense, and that they did not agree with the victim of insult.