A The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months.

2. Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for a year.

except that this shall not apply.

Defendant A, on July 29, 2016, submitted a written complaint to the Southern Mine Police Station prior to the date of 211 in the center of Young-gun, Young-gun, Young-gu, Young-gu, Seoul, the Republic of Korea, stating that “C, without permission, sealed the seal of the complainant (Defendant) on the date of 2016 and forged one copy of the trademark use contract under the name of the complainant (Defendant) and thus, constitutes a crime of forging private documents,” and the same year.

8.5. Attendance at the investigation of the above police station and the strong team office, and the supplementary statement was made to the same effect.

However, in fact, on May 2016, the Defendant prepared a one copy of the trademark use agreement to the effect that the Defendant permitted the use of the trademark right to (ju) for a period of five years to obtain a loan from a new bank in the office located in Young-gun G (ju) office located in Young-gun G (ju) in Young-gun G on the beginning of May 2016, and signed the Defendant’s seal directly on the name of the Defendant, but C did not have forged the above agreement.

Nevertheless, on July 2016, the Defendant filed a false complaint as if C had forged the above contract in order to respond to the suspicion of embezzlement when C was accused of embezzlement.

As a result, the defendant filed a false complaint with C for the purpose of having C punished criminal punishment.

Defendant A of "2016 Highest 6047"

1. On August 30, 2016, the Defendant forged a private document and exercising the above investigation document: (a) at the I certified judicial scrivener office located in Gwangju Dong-dong-gu, Gwangju; (b) there was no fact that the temporary general meeting of shareholders of D was lawfully held; and (c) there was no fact that the representative director D’s temporary general meeting of shareholders was delegated or authorized by C to prepare a copy of the temporary general meeting of shareholders; (d) however, there was no fact that the employee of a certified judicial scrivener office who is aware of such circumstance is appointed as a director of J and A in-house