When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant’s house around October 2012, 110, 702, the victims’ house in Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul apartment house 110, 702, and the fact was that the Defendant did not complete the development of the video-based video-based video-based video-based 3D, and that it was merely a technology converting 2D, similar to the method owned by other companies, into 3D, the Defendant: “The Defendant completed the development of the video-based 3D-based video-based 3D-based 3D-based 3D-based 3D-based 3D-based 3D-based 3D-based 3D-based 3D-based 12, the use of this technology would be 10 billion won or more, and the Defendant would open the office in the HH-based 12-year 100,000 won if investing in the 100,000 won, which is 100 won.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D, F, G, and H;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Statement of the police statement related H;

1. e-mail protocol (I);

1. Application of business plans, copies of passbook transactions, copies of business registration certificates, and copies of certified transcript of register;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination of the Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the assertion was that the Defendant developed the algorithm, which is a type of 3D conversion technology, to the victim, and developed the video-based video-related technology for the first time in the world.

There is no wishing to hold 5% of the investment shares or to hold 5% of the investment shares, establishing J Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “J”) with the victim’s investment funds, and carrying out the actual project.

J argues that it is not necessary to deceiving the victim to acquire the investment money because it transferred it to the victim.

2. According to each evidence duly examined and adopted by this Court, the following facts and circumstances are revealed.