임금
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
1. The Defendant is a company running the taxi transport business, etc., and the Plaintiffs are the taxi drivers who entered into an employment contract with the Defendant and have worked.
The monthly wage, which is the sum of May 4, 201, May 5, 2012, 5, 2012, and 4, 2013, basic salary, allowances, and bonuses under the wage agreement applied between the defendant company and the plaintiffs, is KRW 1,010,000 for the first class, and KRW 880,00 for the second class worker.
(hereinafter referred to as the “instant wage agreement” from 2011 to 2013. According to each of the aforementioned wage agreements, taxi drivers shall pay a certain amount of the transport income received from passengers to the company as follows: (a) taxi drivers shall pay a certain amount of the transport income received from passengers to the company as listed in the following table; and (b) at the time of unpaid payment, they shall be deducted from the monthly wage.
The purport of the whole pleadings and arguments by the model of 126,00 won by the model of 126,000 won by the model of 203,000 won by 98,000 won by the model of 20,000 won per day per 126,000 won per 129,000 won per 129,000 won per day per 2012,000 won per 20,000 won per 125,000 won by the model of 2013, 128,000 won by 128,000 won per 203,000 won per 203,000 won by 128,000 won per 2013
2. The assertion and judgment
A. From January 201 to July 2012, the Plaintiffs’ actual working hours from January 201 to July 201 constitute at least the average of 10 hours per day.
Therefore, the contractual work hours stipulated in the wage agreement of this case are set as hours which are less than the actual work hours of the plaintiffs.
In addition, from January 201 to July 2012, the actual working hours of the plaintiffs were identical or increased compared to the relocation.
Nevertheless, contractual work hours stipulated in the wage agreement of this case have been reduced.
As a result, although the actual working hours of the plaintiffs were not reduced, the level of wages was reduced.
Such a reduction of working hours is not less than the minimum wage level in the form of formal and external aspects by reducing working hours only on the wage agreement without actual reduction of working hours.