For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the charged facts of this case on the ground that there is no proof of crime.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not exhaust all necessary deliberations, but did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the principle of warrant and the legal doctrine on the admissibility of illegally

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.