On December 30, 2019, the Defendant made a written complaint against D and E using a computer in the Defendant’s residence in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu B apartment C, stating that “Around November 14, 2019, the Defendant had two apartment bonds, namely, a member of the Committee for Promotion of the F Regional Housing Association and a representative of the Committee, D and E, the Defendant, who is an employee of the Committee, and the representative of the Committee, had two apartment bonds, deceiving himself/herself who is not qualified as a member, thereby deceiving him/her to be qualified as a member, and received 35 million won as a down payment.”

However, the Defendant was notified of the fact that he had two apartment bonds from D at the time that he was disqualified as a member of the regional housing association, and the Defendant, by itself, prepared a “G” subscription agreement with the members of the regional housing association as KRW 474,700,000, including a letter of undertaking to be qualified as a member of the regional housing association prior to the date of receipt of the

Nevertheless, when the defendant cannot dispose of his apartment after the completion of the above subscription contract, he requested D to withdraw from the Incheon District Prosecutors' Office for the purpose of failing to pay a penalty of 47,470,000 won, which shall be paid in the event that D withdraws due to his own cause attributable to D, but D and E failed to comply with D, D and E shall be subject to criminal punishment, and D and E shall be subject to criminal punishment, and a penalty shall not be paid in the manner of causing imminent conditions of being investigated by submitting a complaint additionally, and withdrawal from the regional housing association on or before December 30, 2019. < Amended by Act No. 1604, Jan. 2, 2020>

Accordingly, the defendant filed a false complaint against a public office for the purpose of having D and E receive criminal punishment, and brought a false complaint against D and E.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's interrogation protocol (No. 15 No. 15) of the defendant's court statement is the police of the defendant.