근저당권말소
1. The Defendants shall have jurisdiction over Busan District Court with respect to each portion of 1/3 of the real estate certificates listed in the separate sheet to the network D.
1. Determination on the cause of the claim
A. On October 31, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking acquisition of a promissory note against the deceased D (principal principal of KRW 29,122,180, delay damages, KRW 88,935,032) against D’s inheritors (the heir’s spouse E, F, and G give up inheritance and become the heir of the deceased’s brothers and sisters). From among the inheritors, H “H shall pay 16,865,316 won and its 4,160,311 won, calculated at the rate of KRW 15% per annum from December 14, 2016 to the date of complete payment, KRW 16,30,160,000, KRW 16,311,000, KRW 16,000, KRW 16,000, KRW 16,0000, KRW 36,0000).
3) N died on November 29, 2008, and there was the Defendants’ children as inheritors. [The facts that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap evidence 1-1-3, Gap evidence 2-1 through 9, and the purport of the whole pleadings.
B. The Plaintiff asserts that the secured debt of the establishment registration of the instant neighboring real estate should be cancelled as a registration without any cause for the establishment registration of the neighboring real estate due to the extinction of the prescription period, and that D’s inheritors seek the cancellation of the establishment registration of the neighboring real estate of this case from the Defendants by subrogation as creditors against D’s inheritors.
In the instant case, spam, etc.