However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

피고인은 2016. 8. 16. 01:40 경 서울 중구 C에 있는 서울 중부 경찰서 D 파출소에서, 무전 취식으로 현행범인 체포되어 와 소란을 피우던 중 위 파출소 소속 경위 E으로부터 제지를 당하게 되자, E에게 “ 짭새, 개새끼, 씨 발 놈 아, 경찰이면 다 야, 경찰 좆만한 새끼, 내가 너희들 잘라 버린다, 칼로 배때기를 찢어 버린다, 서장에게 말해서 가만두지 않겠다” 고 욕설을 하며 머리로 E의 가슴을 3회 들이받는 등 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (the crime of this case is committed by the defendant without prison labor and the nature of the crime is not good; however, the crime of this case is committed by the defendant without prison labor, but the defendant reflects his/her own crime, the degree of the assault is not severe, the defendant has no same criminal history, and there is no history of criminal punishment heavier than the fine, etc.);