beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.05.23 2017고단7579

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On September 13, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. in the support of Suwon Friwon, and the above sentence became final and conclusive on February 13, 2018.

[Criminal facts] 2017 Highest 7579

1. On December 18, 2014, the Defendant, at the office operated by the victim D in the Sincheon-si, Sincheon-si, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D, stating that “The Defendant shall repay the victim KRW 5 million after three days, if he/she lends the money to the victim D.”

However, the defendant did not have any property at the time, and even if he borrowed money from the injured party due to no fixed income, he did not have any intent or ability to repay it.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received KRW 5 million from the injured party to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (F) in the name of E on the same day.

2. 피고인은 2014. 12. 23. 경 제 1 항의 장소에서 위 피해자에게 “60 억 상당의 유스 호스텔 리 모델링 공사를 하고 있는데 큰 돈을 깰 수가 없다.

A false statement was made that a loan of KRW 3 million is to be repaid within one week.

However, the Defendant did not have any way to proceed with the 6 billion won franchise construction, and there was no way to prepare money for the above construction.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred 3 million won to the Saemaul Treasury account (G) account in the name of the defendant on the same day from the victim.

3. On January 16, 2015, at the place stipulated in Paragraph 1 of the same Article, the Defendant concluded that “A victim was investigated by the 3-4 U.S. police station in Ansan-gu in which the complaint was filed by the said victim,” and that “A victim would be paid within one week if he/she borrowed KRW 30 million with the agreed amount.”

However, the defendant did not have any property at the time, and even if he borrowed money from the injured party due to no fixed income, he did not have any intent or ability to repay it.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received from the injured party the money of KRW 30 million from the Saemaul Treasury account (G) in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

4. The Defendant on January 11, 2016