When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a teacher C, and the victim D is a member of the victim group C.

On March 8, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the victim, such as: (a) boarding the victim D (51) in order to spread F, which is the main owner of this C, on the first floor of the elevator; (b) keeping the victim out of the elevator; (c) cutting down the less part of the victim; (d) turning the victim out of the elevator; and (e) turning the victim’s left side bridge, which is drawn down on the elevator floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. The defense counsel's assertion about the defense counsel in the interrogation protocol of the police interrogation protocol against D argues that the defendant's act in the judgment in question constitutes a legitimate act or a legitimate defense. However, considering the situation at the time of the instant case and the method of crime acknowledged by the evidence of this case, it is deemed that the defendant's act in the judgment satisfies the requirements such as the reasonableness, urgency, and supplement of the means required by the legitimate act, etc.

It is difficult to see it.

Therefore, the defense counsel's above assertion is not accepted.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;