강제추행
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On July 24, 2016, around 00:53, the Defendant: (a) changed the phone number to the victim D (the name, leisure, 26 years old); (b) the victim refused to do so; and (c) reported that the victim deviates from the workplace; and (d) the victim committed an indecent act twice by forcing the victim to do so.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D (tentative name) and E;
1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;
1. Article 16 (2) and (4) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Attend a lecture;
1. There are special circumstances under which personal information may not be disclosed, in light of the Defendant’s age, risk of recidivism, record of crime, content and motive of crime, method and seriousness of crime, disclosure order or notification order, the degree of disadvantage and anticipated side effects that may be achieved by such order, prevention of sexual crimes subject to registration, effect on the protection of victims, etc.
If a conviction of the accused is finalized on the criminal facts in the judgment of the sexual crime subject to the registration of personal information, the accused is a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and is obligated to submit personal information to the relevant agency pursuant to Article 43 of the same Act
The reason for sentencing is that the accused committed an indecent act by driving away from the victim who is only mixed in the heart, and it seems that the victim would have caused considerable fear and sexual humiliation to the victim is disadvantageous.
However, the defendant recognizes the crime of this case and reflects the mistake, and the victim seems to be a contingent crime.