beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2015.02.03 2014고단582

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)등

Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Seized evidence No. 19 through 21 shall be confiscated by Defendant A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] Defendant A was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) in a resident support by the Daegu District Court on November 15, 2012 and was sentenced to several times of punishment for the same crime on August 20, 2014.

Defendant

B was sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Daegu District Court on October 17, 2007 and was sentenced to imprisonment for two years and six months. On December 5, 2013, the Daegu District Court sentenced six months to imprisonment for a crime of occupational embezzlement in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch on September 28, 2014 and completed the enforcement of the sentence.

[Criminal Facts] 2014 Highest582]

1. On October 20, 2014, at the F agency operated by the victim E at the time of resident residence around 01:00, the Defendants attempted to habitually steals or steals the victims’ property worth KRW 22,376,50 in total, together with the list of crimes in the attached Form No. 25 times from October 18, 2014 to November 5, 2014, with the view to using the vehicle fuel. Defendant B had a net, and Defendant B attempted to habitually steals or steals the victims’ property worth KRW 22,376,50 in total, as stated in the list of crimes.

2. On October 20, 2014, around 09:50 on October 20, 2014, Defendant A and G discovered the victim J at the first floor of the I Hospital located in Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, stolen the victim’s money and valuables, and followed the victim’s residence. G reported the network, and the Defendant stolen the victim’s property by putting the victim’s cash worth KRW 15,000, market value of KRW 4,200, and KRW 2,000, the market value of the victim’s property.

Accordingly, the defendant is habitually combined with G and the victim's property.