2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of the instant case, and the fact that the Defendant committed each of the instant offenses during the repeated offense period and the injury has not been recovered, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition

[However, the court below's judgment's error in Article 331 (2) of the Criminal Act (the points of concurrent larceny) and Articles 342 and 331 (2) of the Criminal Act (the points of attempted concurrent larceny) are written errors in Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act (the points of concurrent larceny) and Articles 342 and 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of attempted concurrent larceny) of the Criminal Act. Since it is obvious that the number 6 through 11 of the annexed Table 2 of the crime list 2 of the Criminal Procedure Act has been omitted, the above error is corrected ex officio in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure, and it is corrected that the annexed list is added between pages 13 and 14 of the judgment of the court below).