In addition, the appeal by the requester for the order to observe the protection is dismissed.

A. The summary of the grounds for appeal 1) The sentence (4 months of imprisonment) sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable in light of the various sentencing conditions in the instant case.

2) It is unreasonable for the court below to order the disclosure and notification of personal information for a period of three years, even though there are special circumstances under which the disclosure and notification of personal information should not be disclosed or notified to the defendant or the requester for an order to observe the disclosure and notification of personal information (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant").

B. 1) Examining the various sentencing conditions in the instant case regarding the unfair argument of sentencing, the Defendant appears to be against the Defendant’s recognition of the instant crime, and the Defendant would not repeat again through mental treatment.

The fact that the injured party does not want the punishment of the accused by the smooth agreement with the injured party, there is a family to support the accused with his spouse and children, and the mother, spouse, and the second child's health is not good.

However, the crime of this case is likely to cause displeasure and sexual humiliation to not only the victims but also those who are likely to use public toilets. The defendant is punished by imprisonment for the same kind of crime but also again commits the crime of this case during the suspension period. The defendant is not only the same kind of crime but also the same crime committed by the Daegu District Court on June 14, 2007 for the purpose of stealing women to view it as melting a change in the appearance of female toilets. The defendant was punished by a fine of KRW 700,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00 won.