Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

In around 207, the Defendant, as the president of the 7th residents representative meeting of the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment complex B, was accused of having been investigated as occupational breach of trust by the victim C, etc., and thereafter, the Defendant had a malicious evaluation on the victim on the ground that the victim did not help him/her at the election of the president of the resident representative meeting opened by the Defendant. On the other hand, at the Kakao Stockholm conference conference conference where the 17 representative of the above apartment complex was participating, he/she had the victim who had been engaged in the counter-public affairs while working as the police officer in the past.

피고인은 2020. 9. 26. 21:16 경 위 카카오 톡 채팅 방에, 공연히 피해자를 지칭하여 ‘ 악랄하고 파렴치한 개 같은 인간이 동대표 회장의 자문을 하고 있다, 짭새 생활한 모사꾼이다’ 라는 메시지를 게시하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of the Kakao Stockholm dialogue legislation

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;