공갈등
Defendant
All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.
1. The defendant asserts that the summary of the grounds for appeal in the judgment below against the punishment (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor is too unhued and unfair.
2. In light of the judgment, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case repeatedly against many victims despite the fact that the defendant had been punished several times for the same kind of crime, some of the crimes committed during the period of repeated crime, the defendant's total sum of the amounts derived from each of the crimes of extortion is a large amount of 19 million won, which is a reason for disadvantageous sentencing, and the defendant confessions and reflects the defendant, some of the crimes are committed against attempted crimes, and the facts that the court agreed with five victims are favorable reasons for sentencing.
In light of the above sentencing factors comprehensively considering the defendant's age, occupation, character and conduct, family relation, circumstances after the crime, and all other matters regarding the sentencing specified in the records and arguments in this case, the judgment below's punishment is deemed appropriate. Thus, the defendant and prosecutor's assertion are without merit.
3. As such, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.