The defendant is standing in the old setting.

Where any person intends to engage in resting restaurant business, he/she shall receive reports on the resting restaurant business from the competent authorities.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not obtain a report of resting restaurant business from the competent authorities, from January 2013 to December 5, 2013, and illegally operated resting restaurant business on the part of the B commercial building in Yangju City with approximately six square meters of 6 square meters from the B commercial building adjacent to the B commercial building in Yangju City, with electric heat plates, cooling pipes, and other cooking facilities, and with the cooking of Saturdays.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the accuser;

1. Application of statutes on images of field photographs;

1. Article 97 Subparag. 1 of the former Food Sanitation Act (amended by Act No. 11986, Jul. 30, 2013); Article 37(4) of the Food Sanitation Act (elective of fines) that provides for the applicable legal provisions on criminal facts;

1. Punishment to suspend sentence under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 500,000 won when the defendant fails to pay the above fine) (see, e.g., Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act).