beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.05.01 2013고단7192

업무방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2013 Highest 7192"

1. On November 23, 2013, at around 23:30 on November 23, 2013, the Defendant: (a) claimed that the injured party D (58 years of age) on the first floor of the C Building 1 had different from the marcing one; (b) performed the mixed-marcing one in the restaurant; and (c) performed the mixed-marcing one in the restaurant; (d) returned to the restaurant; and (e) obstructed other customers by “ception typ, bits, bits, bits,” and interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force for about one hour by avoiding the disturbance.

2. On November 24, 2013, the Defendant of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (Intimidation of deadly Weapons, etc.) (hereinafter “E”), around 00:50 on November 24, 2013, the term “the victim D reported his/her business to the police by interference with the operation of the Defendant” refers to “the victim’s click softencing softening the victim,” and then threatened the victim by taking a knife knife (21.5cm in length of the knife) posted on the front knife on the knife, thereby threatening the victim.

"2014 Highest 329"

1. From around 00:15 to 00:30 on December 25, 2013, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the Defendant: (b) entered the “Hmat” operated by the Victim G in E in Escoping F while drunkly under the influence of alcohol; and (c) demanded the Victim to pay the alcohol value of the beer who was broken at the air condition; (d) the Victim to “I will pay the money? I will d? I will pay the money? I? I? am? I? I? am? I? I? am? I? I? am? The Defendant interfered with the Victim’s sales of goods by force for about 15 minutes by cutting off the computer monitors, etc. on the floor by hand with the materials in the display stand, and by force.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and at the same place as above paragraph 1, is a big interest to the Defendant, “I, the wife of the G, and the police officer, who was reported to be in a state that J was being in compliance with the said G, G’s situation,” and called “I do not have been frighted. Mara, L. L. L. I, the Defendant,” who was called out, “I do not have been frighted” to the Defendant.