No trader or distributor of goods, etc. shall make a false or misleading indication of origin or make any misleading indication of origin.

Nevertheless, as the Defendant was unable to import the North Korean fishery products in accordance with the government's measures to refrain from the trade in North Korea (U.S. 524 measures) since the breadth in North Korea occurred, the Defendant agreed to import the North Korean Free Trade Zone into the Republic of Korea upon request from E, who is a Dr. Dr. located in the Sami-si in China.

On June 8, 2011, the Defendant (representative G) concluded a bank L/C agency contract with the North Korean company (credit transaction). On June 8, 201, the Defendant imported 15,000 g (120 million g (10,000 g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g

2. According to the evidence submitted by the judgment prosecutor, the defendant was replaced by China D on June 8, 201, 15,000 g, the same year.

6. 15. Wook 15,000 g, the same year

6. 22. Recognizing that each import of 15,00 km is recognized.

However, the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the catch caught by a vessel of Chinese nationality outside the territorial sea or exclusive economic zone of a country other than China is a Chinese country, and thus, its origin cannot be readily concluded as North Korea, and that the defendant had no intention to indicate the vessel of North Korea as North Korea. Thus, in the case of this case, the defendant was North Korea.