2. The following facts are considered: (a) the Defendant took part in the manual of a serious sprinking crime and did not recover damage; and (b) the Defendant again committed a crime under the same manual even though he was punished by a fine due to a serious sprinking crime; (c) the Defendant was committed under the same manual, which is disadvantageous to the Defendant; (d) the Defendant is led to confession and separate cases (the Government District Court Decision 2020 Mandan609 fraud, etc.).

In addition, it is not determined that the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or unreasonable in light of the following factors, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive, details and method of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., and the sentencing conditions specified in the instant records and arguments.

Therefore, we do not accept the defendant and prosecutor's allegation of unfair sentencing.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.