The judgment below

Even if examining the reasoning of the instant facts charged based on evidence, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the facts contrary to logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the legality of the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, and assault, contrary to what is alleged in

Meanwhile, the argument that the lower court did not recognize self-defense in the grounds of appeal is not a legitimate ground of appeal, which is alleged in the ground of appeal by the Defendant as the grounds of appeal or by the lower court’s ex officio decision.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.