When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Defendant

A is a person who conducts a seed farming business by installing an index aquaculture facility (which shall not discharge the number of raising livestock used in the aquaculture) with the trade name of Da in the South Sea Zone B.

In spite of the fact that anyone does not commit an act of dumping excreta, livestock excreta, animal carcass, waste, or sludge into a public water zone without justifiable cause, the Defendant discharged sludge (vegetable Kim because sludge, such as boom and scam, has been discharged from a new dye dye dye dye dye dye hye hye hye hye hye hye hye hye, hye hye hye hye hye hye,

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Photographss of the sea area, front of the aquaculture, and internal photographs of the aquaculture;

1. Each wastewater inspection report and each water quality inspection report;

1. A report on the results of each business trip;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to notify the closure of land seawater fisheries routes;

1. Article 78 of the relevant Act on the Punishment of Criminal Crimes and Article 78 subparagraph 3 of the Act on the Selective Water Quality and Their Life Conservation; and Article 15 (1) 2 (Punishment);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.