When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 27, 2014, at around 19:30 on March 27, 2014, the Defendant stated that the victim was present as a witness in the E-cafeteria operated by the victim D in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, that “bresh, path, spath, spath, and spathing,” and spathly 15 minutes of the disturbance, which interfered with the eating of customers, and prevented them from entering the E-cafeteria operated by the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of part of the protocol of interrogation of the accused by the prosecution against the accused in the prosecutor's office (the fact that he/she was found in the victim's restaurant at the time);

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Application of the video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;