beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.12.22 2015나17270

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the first instance court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: "the results of the fact-finding on the Franchisor of this court's Franchisor" for the reasons of the first instance judgment; "the results of the fact-finding on the Franchisor of this court's first instance court's Franchisor"; "the results of the fact-finding on the Franchisor of this court's C" for "the results of the fact-finding on the Franchisor of this court's first instance court's results of the fact-finding on the C in the first instance court's judgment's request for the appraisal and supplementary examination" for "the results of the first instance court's request for the appraisal of the Franchisor of the

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.