공사대금
1. The plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On January 25, 2013, the Defendant: (a) concluded a contract for the construction of the new construction project in the Dondong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si (the location: 2,86,00,000 won (including the supply price of KRW 2,860,000,000); (b) advance payment amount of KRW 314,60,000; and (c) the timing and method of payment for progress payment of KRW 314,60,000; and (d) the warranty period of defect liability period of KRW 3 years (the structure is 10 years); (c) the contract deposit of KRW 314,60,600,000,000.
(hereinafter referred to as the “instant contract”). (b)
On November 22, 2013, the Plaintiff is against the construction of the present citizens.
Contract amount of the swimming works from among port works: 187,00,000 (supply price of 170,000,000, value of additional duties 17,000,000), the payment of the price shall be made under the same conditions as the payment conditions in cash as that in the place of the order, with respect to the adjustment of the price and payment due to any change in a design, economic situation change, etc., within 30 days from the date of adjustment from the ordering person, payment within 15 days from the date of receiving from the ordering person, and the warranty period: the subcontract of the construction works under the three-year agreement (hereinafter in
2. The allegations by the parties and the determination thereof
A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff, the principal contractor, had determined to divide the details of the parts executed by the Plaintiff, the subcontractor, at the time of inspection of approval for the use of the Defendant, who is the original contractor, and request the payment of the subcontract price in installments. The Plaintiff and the Defendant, the principal contractor, through a three-party agreement between the Plaintiff and the present civil construction site agent A and the Defendant’s general affairs, were to pay the subcontract price directly to the subcontractor. As a result of the Plaintiff’s settlement after the completion of the subcontracted project, the total construction cost of KRW 41,00,000 was increased and the subcontract price was 228,00,000,000, and the Defendant’s direct payment agreement was concluded on February 20