성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that each of the original judgments (a fine of 4 million won, a fine of 2 million won, and a fine of 2 million won) is too uneased and unreasonable.
2. Defendant A, as the owner of a sexual traffic business establishment, and Defendant B, as the head of a sexual traffic business establishment, conspired with each other to commit the instant sexual traffic arrangement business. In light of the background and content leading up to the said crime, the nature of the crime is not good, and all the Defendants already have the record of criminal punishment of fines for the same kind of crime.
However, in full view of the following factors: (a) the Defendants led to the instant crime; (b) the period of the instant crime; (c) the amount of gains acquired by the instant crime; and (d) the age, family environment of the Defendants; and (c) the circumstances before and after the instant crime, the sentence of the lower court against the Defendants is too uneasible and unreasonable.
3. If so, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.