명예훼손
All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.
1. The Defendant is a person who is the victim C and her husband, and the fact is that the victim does not have the wind, and the third her husband is a child born between the victim and her husband.
Nevertheless, the Defendant:
1. On October 2014, 2014, D is clearly married to D in the playal elementary school playground located in the Dongdong-dong of Daejeon Sung-gu, Daejeon. The same shall apply to the following:
C has been winded.
"" means ","
2. On August 2015, 2015, D is a mixed blood relationship between D and a foreign worker, who had difficulty with D and third faces, on the road of the long-range of long-distance in the Daejeon Pungdong-gu, Daejeon.
"" means ","
3. 2016. 3. 중순경 불상의 장소에서 E에게 전화를 걸어 "C 의 셋째 딸의 얼굴이 까맣다.
C The same shall apply to those which have winded.
"" means ","
4. On the road located in Daejeon Sung-gu, Daejeon on July 2016, F. F. F. F. “C’s father and wife’s husband and wife’s husband and wife’s husband and wife’s husband and wife’s husband are winded.”
“...”
Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.
2. Determination
(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention (Article 312 (2) of the Criminal Act);
B. The victim expressed his intention not to punish him after the prosecution of this case
C. Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act)