[2013 Height341]

1. The Defendant, even though having not been delegated by C with respect to the opening of a mobile phone from C, was aware of the fact that the Defendant, even though having not been delegated with the opening of a mobile phone, he was aware of the fact by opening a mobile phone

On March 29, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around March 29, 2013, at the mobile phone sales store located in Jindo-gun, Jindo-gun; (b) caused F, a business operator of the said E, to enter “G”, “H”, and “A” in the name column of the service new contract in the name of “G”, resident registration number column, and address column; and (c) made F, a business operator of the said E, who is aware of such fact, sign the said G name.

In this way, for the purpose of exercising rights and obligations, the Defendant forged three new contracts in the name of C, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in Paragraph 1, had the said F send a forged service new contract by facsimile to an employee under the name of the SK Telecom, who is aware of the forgery.

3. Fraud;

A. The Defendant exercised the service new contract, as described in Paragraph 1, at the time and place, as described in Paragraph 2, and received two mobile phones (SHV-E250W-32G (Titt), SHV-E220S (Titt) from the victim F.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

B. On May 28, 2009, at around 02:40 on May 28, 2009, the Defendant sold an item at a mutually aesthetic PC located in the Jung-gu, Busan Metropolitan City on the goods trading bulletin board of the Internet site.

A notice was posted to the effect that it is "..."

However, the fact was that the defendant's possession could not be used normally due to hacking acquired from others.

Nevertheless, the defendant is now under normal circumstances.