beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2013.07.17 2013고단58

상해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 11:35 on July 22, 2012, the Defendant drinking alcohol as the victim E (the age of 45) at the D restaurant located in Seopopo City C, Seopopo City, and caused a dispute to women.

Accordingly, when the defendant's face of the victim was taken several times as food, the defendant suffered bodily injury such as internal body organs, bones, bones, bones, etc. in the number of days of treatment.

2. On July 22, 2012, around 11:53, the Defendant: (a) committed assault to the G Hospital Emergency Office in Seogpo City F on the grounds of Paragraph (1) and, on the grounds of the same paragraph, the security guards belonging to the H District in the Seopo Police Station in the Seocho-gu Police Station, which was reported on the ground as set forth in paragraph (1) to explain to the Defendant that the victim’s personal information should be necessary for the medical treatment of the hospital; and (b) asked the Defendant to ask him of his personal information; and (c) he interfered with the legitimate performance of duties concerning the movement of the police officer on the spot by assaulting the police officer, such as flabing the bat J-gu spath, which prevented him from taking away from his left breath on one occasion by drinking.

3. The Defendant, who was arrested as a flagrant offender on the ground of paragraphs 1 and 2, boarded on the back seat of the Hopo Police Station H District patrol vehicle (K) and was traveling along the H district, destroyed the glass of the patrol vehicle used as public goods from the H district unit of the Seopo Police Station, by taking the back of the patrol vehicle, the strengthening glass on the right side of the back seat of the patrol vehicle was removed from the door even if the market price preventing escape was unsatisfed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement to E, I, and J;

1. The damaged patrol picture of even gate of the damaged police, photographs of damaged police officers, and photographs of damaged E of the damaged police;

1. Application of return-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (the punishment prescribed for the crimes of obstruction of performance of official duties among the crimes of obstruction of official duties, and punishment for the crimes of obstruction of official duties against I of the grave concurrent crimes);

1. Selection of penalty: Imprisonment with prison labor;