beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.04.10 2014가단37946

매매대금

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 19,00,000 as well as the annual rate of KRW 5% from July 17, 2014 to October 1, 2014 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Although there is no dispute between the parties to the claim or according to the purport of Gap evidence No. 1 and the whole pleadings, the plaintiff made gold-type products listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter "gold-type products of this case") around June 1, 2013 by using materials provided by the defendant and the defendant, and the defendant agreed to pay 62,000,000 won to the plaintiff as the price for the production of the gold-type products of this case on November 25, 2013. The plaintiff completed the gold-type products of this case. The plaintiff demanded 1,630,000 won for the plaintiff's annual business trip from the day following the 20th day after the 30th day after the 10th day after the 10th day after the 20th day after the 10th day after the 20th day after the 20th day after the 20th day after the 20th day after the 14th day after the 20th day after the 20th day after the 3th day after the 20th day after the 3th day after the 30th day after the request.

참조조문