When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who drives a DNA car.

On March 2, 2016, around 10:56, the Defendant: (a) moved to F cafeteria E at regular Eup on the front of the F cafeteria; (b) while driving along two lanes on the two-lane roads, disregarding the fact that the vehicle progress signal is changed to a stop signal; and (c) without turning the direction, etc., even though it was likely to obstruct the normal traffic of H-si driving by G (50 years old) driven by one lane, the Defendant kidd in the front of the victim’s taxi.

Accordingly, the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (b) operated the said mast car in front of the said taxi at a sudden level; (c) operated the said mast car in front of the said taxi; (d) reworking the said mast car at a sudden level; and (e) made the G reworking the fluor by reworking the fluor; (e) reworking the fluor; and (e) caused danger to traffic by engaging in any signal violation, any violation of prohibition of career change, or any violation of the prohibition of fluoring.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on closure photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions and subparagraphs 1 and 5 of Article 151-2, and subparagraphs 1 and 5 of Article 46-3 of the Road Traffic Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order include the fact that the defendant is urgent, interfered with the operation of the vehicle following the vehicle, and the responsibility for the vehicle in distress that may cause danger to traffic is not negligible, etc., and the sentencing conditions unfavorable to the defendant, the defendant's timing of and wrong against the crime, the fact that the driver of the vehicle following the vehicle following the vehicle was smoothly agreed with the driver of the vehicle following the vehicle, and there are some other circumstances that may be somewhat taken into account the motive and circumstances of the crime of this case that occurred while the defendant was driving in an area that is not familiar with the geographic, etc., as well as other favorable conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and background of the crime,