However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendants’ joint crime Defendant B operated the automobile security loan business from May 2016 to August 2016 under the trade name “E” with D in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as well as D.

Defendant

A on May 2016, 2016, Defendant B, as a security for a siren car, borrowed 3 million won from that time to August 2016, Defendant B, who was in charge of a siren vehicle, such as K5 and A-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed Led-Wed Led-Wed-Wed Led Led-Wed-Wed-Wed Led Led-Wed Led-Wed Led-Wed Led Led-Wed Led Led-Wed Led-Wed Led Led-Wed Led

Defendant

A, as such, while preventing siren return, he/she was unable to meet the rental fee of KRW 10,000 per month, and even though he/she was faced with the situation where he/she was unable to repay the borrowed money to Defendant B, he/she borrowed the said vehicle from Defendant B as security on August 4, 2016 and borrowed money to Defendant B on the same day on the same day.

After that, August 10, 2016, the above car was forced to be recovered from the rental car due to the unpaid rental fee, and Defendant B was on board the car leased from the rental car.

Defendant A, upon receiving the claim from G, became aware of the fact that Defendant A was forced to recover the car due to unpaid rental fee, and Defendant A conspiredd to inquire into whether Defendant A was a person who uses the franchise HG rental vehicle that he left as security through E employee D with knowledge that the vehicle provided as security is in a position that it is impossible to cover the rental fee, even though Defendant A was aware of the fact that the vehicle provided as security is a number of prices.

D As such, on August 17, 2016, the victim H was unable to receive money by signing an advertisement with a representative of the advertising company A from among those who want to do so.

section 3.

It is possible to solve the loan within a week from the lending of money, and if it is possible to lend money to the HaG vehicle as a security, and if it is possible to reduce the difference.

Defendant B referred to as “,” and Defendant B.