The accused shall disclose the summary of the judgment of innocence.

A. The judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles as to the fact that the defendant testified at the time of the defendant's memory as he did not constitute an element of perjury, because he/she was memoryd with no farmer at the time of his/her memory.

B. Even if the instant facts charged are found guilty, the lower court’s punishment (amounting to KRW 3 million) is too unreasonable.

2. On January 24, 2014, the Defendant, at the court of Suwon District Court No. 201, the Suwon District Court No. 80, 201, which was located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the summary of the facts charged in the instant case, was present as a witness of the revocation of a disposition rejecting to change the applicable classification, which is the head of the said court No. 3256, the said court’s 2013-Gu Branch Office