도로법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. On August 27, 2004, the summary of the facts charged, C, an employee of the defendant, loaded cargo exceeding the limit on the road front of the business office of the Gugg-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri (26.9
2. Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 193; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 4920, Jun. 1, 1993; Act No. 4920, Apr. 1, 1995; Act No. 2065, Nov. 28, 2005; Act No. 2014; Act No. 2497, Dec. 28, 2005; Act No. 2014; Act No. 2065, Apr. 1, 2007; Act No. 20655, Dec. 1, 200; Act No. 2481; Act No. 3786, Dec. 28, 2005; Act No. 3781, Dec. 16, 2005).
3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, a judgment of innocence is rendered pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.