except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant and the victim B (the age of 58) are married couple.

On February 15, 2013, at around 20:30 on February 20, 2013, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim at least 1.5L Patch disease consisting of drinking water that the victim had been living in the ward on the ground that the victim would grow her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her his her her her her her her her her her her her her shes

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. B accusation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the decision of type) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution is that general injury [the scope of the recommendation field and the recommendation form] basic area, April to one year and six months [the decision of the suspension of execution] there are no contingent crimes, nor any criminal records above the suspension of execution [the decision of sentence] six months of imprisonment, the suspension of execution of one year and two years: the victim suffered five-year bodily injury; the victim is not responsible for causing the crime; the victim is not responsible for causing the crime; the victim is not an unagreement; however, the punishment is not easy, taking into account the fact that the crime is contingent crimes; there is no criminal records above the suspension of execution; and the fact that it is against the order.