2. The judgment of the court below constitutes a ground for disadvantageous sentencing, including the fact that the defendant has been punished for the same kind of crime over several occasions and commits the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime. However, considering the fact that the degree of interference with the business of this case is relatively minor and that the victim does not have to be punished against the defendant, comprehensively considering the various circumstances, including the fact that the victim agreed with the victim and the victim do not have to have the punishment against the defendant, the sentencing of the court below seems to be appropriate, and thus the prosecutor'

3. Accordingly, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.