If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On December 17, 2016, at around 21:30 on December 17, 2016, the Defendant damaged the property in which the sum of repair costs would be KRW 300,000,00,000, including the number of copies attached to the radio microphones equivalent to KRW 2.50,000 in the market value.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties shall report to confirm CCTV images by entering a singing room in order to verify the circumstances of this case F, which were sent to the scene by 112 reports at the same time and place as those mentioned in the preceding paragraph, and entered the singing room, “to be confirmed within the internal house,” and entered the room, thereby keeping the said F’s body in good faith, and knife his hand.

In the process of continuing arrest and accompanying to the earth as a current offender, the police officer committed violence, such as booming a patroler belonging to the said patrol group and preventing the destruction of firearms, thereby obstructing the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the mobilization of 112 report and the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to C, F, and G;

1. Investigation report (on-site conditions, etc.), - Application of photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (limited to cases where a person interferes with the execution of official duties);

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act: Circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that he/she has been sentenced to a suspended sentence by obstructing the performance of official duties in 2003: The fact that he/she agreed with the victim for damage, the degree of interference with the performance of official duties, the fact that he/she did not focus on the degree of interference with the performance of official duties, and the previous conviction of the suspended sentence and the year